Rum tasting

Bristol Classic, Panama 2010

Bristol Classic Rum’s Panama 2010 is a bottling that sits within a style I have been spending more time with recently. Panamanian rum has been a consistent source of enjoyment for me, so this felt like a natural one to pick up and explore further.

This is my fourth or fifth rum from the independent bottler Bristol Classic and I’ve had the pleasure of trying a lot of their releases! There’s a level of consistency in their releases that I really value. Their approach tends to let the rum speak for itself, which really suits this profile.


Facts & Figures.

ABV: 47%

Country: Panama

Age: 12 years

Cask: American Oak

Still: Column Still

Price: £60

Distillery: Unknown


On the nose.

A very gentle and inviting profile with a decent amount of woody spice. Fresh vanilla bean adds sweetness and counter balances the toasted oak. This hints at some fragrant, fruity notes but I can’t quite name them.

On the palate.

The vanilla sweetness and toasted, warm oak spice immediately follow through from the nose with quite a dry mouthfeel. A little astringency is present, but it’s not unpleasant. Pineapple and mixed berries are subtle but present. On the finish some caramel develops. This is quite a refined profile with most of the flavour and character happening in the margins rather than being outlandish bold flavours.


7/10 – this is a really enjoyable rum I’m looking forward to spending more time unpicking.

My scoring system, explained
  • 10: Exceptional. This is best in class and a firm favourite of mine.
  • 9: Outstanding. Near perfection, a bottle I would be sad to finish (and very happy to restock!)
  • 8: Excellent. An evening spent sipping this would be a very good one.
  • 7: Great. Add to cart, no questions asked.
  • 6: Very good. At the right price I would definitely buy a bottle.
  • 5: Good. If someone poured me a glass you wouldn’t hear me complain.
  • 4: Above average. Not quite good but better than some.
  • 3: Average. Average at best, this isn’t offensive but equally not exciting either.
  • 2: Not for me. This simply means it’s not a profile I find enjoyable; rather than a reflection of quality.
  • 1: Not the spirit. This is a poor representation of the spirit.